This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: ARM long branch stubs: be8

From: Paul Brook <paul at codesourcery dot com>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
Cc: binutils at sourceware dot org, Richard Earnshaw <Richard dot Earnshaw at arm dot com>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 14:48:16 +0000
Subject: Re: ARM long branch stubs: be8
References: <49A28B22.3090603@st.com> <49A3F81A.4020409@st.com> <20090224142002.GC3182@caradoc.them.org>

> > What confused me is that objdump -d dumps opcodes in a different order in
> > the BE8 case. Maybe it could be enhanced to make use of the BE8 EABI
> > flag?
>
> That would make sense to me, and the *-be8.d files could go away then.
> Paul, Richard, what do you think?

I agree. IMHO the current be8 objdump behavior is a bug.

Paul

References:
- ARM long branch stubs: be8
  - From: Christophe LYON
- Re: ARM long branch stubs: be8
  - From: Christophe LYON
- Re: ARM long branch stubs: be8
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]