This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sourceware.org
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: Patch [avr]: makes avr-6 incompatible with other avr architectures
- From: Tristan Gingold <gingold at adacore dot com>
- To: "Weddington, Eric" <eweddington at cso dot atmel dot com>
- Cc: <binutils at sourceware dot org>, "Denis Chertykov" <chertykov at gmail dot com>, "Anatoliy Sokolov" <aesok at post dot ru>
- Date: Fri, 5 Dec 2008 14:17:03 +0100
- Subject: Re: Patch [avr]: makes avr-6 incompatible with other avr architectures
- References: <8840DAA1-9BCE-4D53-B0CF-18E6A6C7E941@adacore.com> <258DDD1F44B6ED4AAFD4370847CF58D50408902D@csomb01.corp.atmel.com>
On Dec 4, 2008, at 7:22 PM, Weddington, Eric wrote:
Hi Tristan,
If you are checking if the machine is equal to bfd_mach_avr6
earlier, then we should also change the <= operators in the line
above to be only <. Like so:
if (a->mach < bfd_mach_avr6 && b->mach < bfd_mach_avr6)
Ok.
So I assume you agree with this new restriction.
(I also though about a universal avr architecture but I am not sure it
is worth)
Tristan.