This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Resetting LMA for new VMAs

From: Nathan Sidwell <nathan at codesourcery dot com>
To: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>
Cc: binutils <binutils at sources dot redhat dot com>
Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2008 12:46:38 +0100
Subject: Re: Resetting LMA for new VMAs
References: <47F6113D.8030201@codesourcery.com> <20080404130949.GC7643@lucon.org>

H.J. Lu wrote:

Did you test both i686-linux and x86-64-linux 2.6 kernel build? Last
time when we changed it, it broke Linux kernel build.

No, that's exactly why I'm asking -- I can't be expected to know about all the bespoke linker scripts out there :) Is the behaviour I observed an intentional? It is documented in the manual, but I found it surprising.

nathan

--
Nathan Sidwell    ::   http://www.codesourcery.com   ::         CodeSourcery

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Resetting LMA for new VMAs
  - From: Nathan Sidwell

References:
- Resetting LMA for new VMAs
  - From: Nathan Sidwell
- Re: Resetting LMA for new VMAs
  - From: H.J. Lu

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]