This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sourceware.org
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: [patch bfd]: Add further support for x86_64 mingw
- From: NightStrike <nightstrike at gmail dot com>
- To: "Kai Tietz" <Kai dot Tietz at onevision dot com>
- Cc: "H.J. Lu" <hjl dot tools at gmail dot com>, Binutils <binutils at sourceware dot org>, "Brian Dessent" <brian at dessent dot net>, "Kai Tietz" <ktietz70 at googlemail dot com>, "Nick Clifton" <nickc at redhat dot com>
- Date: Mon, 4 Feb 2008 22:36:01 -0500
- Subject: Re: [patch bfd]: Add further support for x86_64 mingw
- References: <20080204153803.GA11121@lucon.org> <OF87A2F223.26E4FB87-ONC12573E5.0056CF2A-C12573E5.00570F1C@onevision.de>
On 2/4/08, Kai Tietz <Kai.Tietz@onevision.com> wrote:
> > Do you want to use -Wno-format on 64bit mingw? I thought 64bit mingw
> > was OK. Otherwise, you will see the same error on 64bit mingw.
>
> Yes, because this feature is available until gcc 4.4 (AFAICS). If you
> don't apply the patch file for gcc 4.3, you will have the same results as
> for any mingw target. The patch to gcc affects all mingw targets.
If this is changed in binutils, will the change be reverted once gcc
4.4 is released?