This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: PATCH: PR gas/5534: "XXX PTR" isn't checked properly inIntelsyntax

From: "Jan Beulich" <jbeulich at novell dot com>
To: "H.J. Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
Cc: <binutils at sourceware dot org>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 08:59:29 +0000
Subject: Re: PATCH: PR gas/5534: "XXX PTR" isn't checked properly inIntelsyntax
References: <477DE9CA0200007800043BD5@public.id2-vpn.continvity.gns.novell.com> <20080104142820.GA32381@lucon.org> <20080111000335.GA10034@lucon.org> <4787561E.76E4.0078.0@novell.com> <20080111231347.GA23357@lucon.org>

>Unspecified means size can be unspecified. AnySize means any size
>is ok.

But you continue to have Unspecified in places where a size specification
is a requirement (at least in Intel syntax; I never got any clarification on
whether AT&T syntax silently enforcing a certain size if none was
specified is really intended behavior).

>Here is the updated patch. Now it reports error on all lines
>in intelbad.s.

Looks fine, and errors on all lines of intelbad.s was always the goal.

Jan

Follow-Ups:
- Re: PATCH: PR gas/5534: "XXX PTR" isn't checked properly inIntelsyntax
  - From: H.J. Lu

References:
- Re: PATCH: PR gas/5534: "XXX PTR" isn't checked properly in Intel syntax
  - From: Jan Beulich
- Re: PATCH: PR gas/5534: "XXX PTR" isn't checked properly in Intel syntax
  - From: H.J. Lu
- Re: PATCH: PR gas/5534: "XXX PTR" isn't checked properly in Intel syntax
  - From: H.J. Lu
- Re: PATCH: PR gas/5534: "XXX PTR" isn't checked properly in Intelsyntax
  - From: H.J. Lu

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]