This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Add x86 SSE5 instructions to the GNU binary utilities

From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
To: "rajagopal, dwarak" <dwarak dot rajagopal at amd dot com>
Cc: binutils at sourceware dot org, "Meissner, Michael" <michael dot meissner at amd dot com>, "Harle, Christophe" <christophe dot harle at amd dot com>
Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2007 15:46:57 -0700
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add x86 SSE5 instructions to the GNU binary utilities
References: <20070831175452.GA17876@mmeissner-gold.amd.com> <9E1304B144EBEB4C97F4162BFAC478863D2AED@SAUSEXMB2.amd.com> <20070913203026.GA2794@lucon.org> <9E1304B144EBEB4C97F4162BFAC4788648E64D@SAUSEXMB2.amd.com>

On Thu, Sep 13, 2007 at 05:30:33PM -0500, rajagopal, dwarak wrote:
> The patch does not contain the generated files (i386-init.h and
> i386-tbl.h). I have also fixed the coding typos you mentioned in the
> assembler.
> 
> Is this ok?
> 

Please try my OPC_EXT_45 suggestion on top of

http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2007-09/msg00172.html

When I wrote get_valid_dis386, I forgot to handle IS_3BYTE_OPCODE.
With this, we don't need to special case IS_3BYTE_OPCODE in
print_insn.

Thanks.


H.J.

Follow-Ups:
- RE: [PATCH] Add x86 SSE5 instructions to the GNU binary utilities
  - From: rajagopal, dwarak

References:
- RE: [PATCH] Add x86 SSE5 instructions to the GNU binary utilities
  - From: rajagopal, dwarak
- Re: [PATCH] Add x86 SSE5 instructions to the GNU binary utilities
  - From: H.J. Lu
- RE: [PATCH] Add x86 SSE5 instructions to the GNU binary utilities
  - From: rajagopal, dwarak

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]