This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sourceware.org
mailing list for the binutils project.
RE: PATCH: Convert x86 assembler to bitfield
- From: "Meissner, Michael" <michael dot meissner at amd dot com>
- To: "H.J. Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
- Cc: "Harle, Christophe" <christophe dot harle at amd dot com>, "rajagopal, dwarak" <dwarak dot rajagopal at amd dot com>, binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 19:03:20 -0400
- Subject: RE: PATCH: Convert x86 assembler to bitfield
Ok. Obviously, I did not look at the final patch. I will do so
shortly. Thanks.
--
Michael Meissner
AMD, MS 83-29
90 Central Street
Boxborough, MA 01719
> -----Original Message-----
> From: H.J. Lu [mailto:hjl@lucon.org]
> Sent: Saturday, September 08, 2007 7:02 PM
> To: Meissner, Michael
> Cc: Harle, Christophe; rajagopal, dwarak; binutils@sources.redhat.com
> Subject: Re: PATCH: Convert x86 assembler to bitfield
>
> On Sat, Sep 08, 2007 at 03:35:22PM -0400, Meissner, Michael wrote:
> > As I have mentioned before, this uses a C99/new GCC feature
(designated
> > initializers) when you are building the x86 instruction tables. I
> > really don't feel binutils should be using anything outside of C90
> > because binutils, like GCC is part of the kit needed to port to
systems
>
> There are no designated initializers in my final patch at all. If
> you found one, please let me know.
>
> Thanks.
>
>
> H.J.
>