This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sourceware.org
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: PATCH: Convert x86 assembler to bitfield
- From: "H.J. Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
- To: "Meissner, Michael" <michael dot meissner at amd dot com>
- Cc: "Harle, Christophe" <christophe dot harle at amd dot com>, "rajagopal, dwarak" <dwarak dot rajagopal at amd dot com>, binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Sat, 8 Sep 2007 16:02:00 -0700
- Subject: Re: PATCH: Convert x86 assembler to bitfield
- References: <20070907210534.GA13049@lucon.org> <6096959DEF5C9447A6BF80BDC7EB9EDC06156107@SBOSEXMB1.amd.com>
On Sat, Sep 08, 2007 at 03:35:22PM -0400, Meissner, Michael wrote:
> As I have mentioned before, this uses a C99/new GCC feature (designated
> initializers) when you are building the x86 instruction tables. I
> really don't feel binutils should be using anything outside of C90
> because binutils, like GCC is part of the kit needed to port to systems
There are no designated initializers in my final patch at all. If
you found one, please let me know.
Thanks.
H.J.