This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: GNU hash-style compatibility problem on x86_64

From: Mike Frysinger <vapier at gentoo dot org>
To: binutils at sourceware dot org
Cc: "Eric Botcazou" <ebotcazou at libertysurf dot fr>, "Greg Schafer" <gschafer at zip dot com dot au>, "DJ Delorie" <dj at redhat dot com>
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2007 12:45:07 -0400
Subject: Re: GNU hash-style compatibility problem on x86_64
References: <20070814125638.GA11842@caradoc.them.org> <20070815005828.GA1267@eyo32.local> <02ba01c7e687$368de1f0$0a00000a@galilee>

On Friday 24 August 2007, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> > But it's still a mystery why x86 and ppc don't need this.. oh well.
>
> Their BFD backend is more liberal and accepts sections with unknown IDs.

looks like ia64 falls into the "very anal" category as well
-mike

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

References:
- Re: GNU hash-style compatibility problem on x86_64
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: GNU hash-style compatibility problem on x86_64
  - From: Greg Schafer
- Re: GNU hash-style compatibility problem on x86_64
  - From: Eric Botcazou

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]