This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: PATCH: Map GNU attributes section to PT_GNU_ATTR (aka PT_GNU_STACK) segment


On Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 08:21:01AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 16, 2007 at 02:05:08PM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
> > For the attribute info in executable and shared library, there
> > should be no difference between linker and loader. Do we need
> > the full content of .ARM.attributes section in executable and shared
> > library? It sounds to me that PT_ARM_ARCHEXT can just have a
> > .ARM.attributes section which can be generated from .ARM.attributes
> > in input relocatable files.  .ARM.attributes in executable and shared
> > library can smaller and different from .ARM.attributes in relocatable
> > files. Readelf will check PT_ARM_ARCHEXT to see how .ARM.attributes
> > should be processed.
> 
> I think that it is reasonably likely that some tools (e.g. ld and gdb)
> will need more information than ld.so.
> 
> Since I have serious misgivings about this patch, there are no uses
> yet, and Mike has said you've broken Blackfin and FRV uClinux, could
> you please revert it until we have a better plan in place?  Thanks.
> 

Done.


H.J.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]