This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: "size" of relocatable objects

From: "H. J. Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
To: binutils at sourceware dot org
Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 18:43:37 -0700
Subject: Re: "size" of relocatable objects
References: <20070522013428.GA10695@bubble.grove.modra.org>

On Tue, May 22, 2007 at 11:04:28AM +0930, Alan Modra wrote:
> Someone at IBM noticed that "size" ignores common variables in
> relocatable object files, and wondered whether we could enhance "size"
> to show them.  Well, of course we can, but should we?  Opinions?

I think adding a new switch to size isn't a bad idea.


H.J.

References:
- "size" of relocatable objects
  - From: Alan Modra

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]