This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Thursday 08 March 2007, Steve Ellcey wrote: > > You'll still need libtool.m4. > > Are you sure? According to > <http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool/manual.html#Distributing> we > shouldn't need libtool.m4 in our package. i'm pretty sure those guidelines are for people making their final redistributable source tarball ... since you shouldnt be regenerating autotools with that package, you shouldnt include the libtool.m4 in the sourceware case, regenerating the files happens often so the .m4 should be included to match the ltmain.sh ... very weird things can happen if the libtool code that makes it into configure (via the .m4/aclocal) is a different version from the ltmain.sh ... i like the one where shared libraries are generated but they lack the '.so' suffix :) -mike
Attachment:
pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |