This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
I need much more than 2 bits, which won't fit in the current 32bit int.
Then I suggest adding another field. I don't think we can force people to use a C99 compiler to build binutils.
Adding another field will lead to massive changes to x86 assembler. I will use long long if C99 feature isn't desirable.
"long long" _is_ a C99 feature. GCC had it before of course, but not all the world builds binutils using GCC ;-)
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |