This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: binutils Digest of: thread.48746

From: NightStrike <nightstrike at gmail dot com>
To: binutils at sourceware dot org
Date: Fri, 29 Dec 2006 06:32:03 -0500
Subject: Re: binutils Digest of: thread.48746
References: <1167391754.6285.ezmlm@sourceware.org> <b609cb3b0612290331n500cbdfenbe0ac18c7519cc96@mail.gmail.com>

Ben,

I just downloaded the cvs of binutils, and did not see this patch
applied.  Also, what about the other four patches Kai supplied?

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Ben Elliston <bje+dated+1167181316.140866@air.net.au>
To: Kai Tietz <Kai.Tietz@onevision.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 12:01:52 +1100
Subject: Re: Renaming mingw64 to mingw* for x86_64 architecure
Hi.

> Reasoned by some discussion with Ben Elliston I renamed the target
> name for x86_64-pc-mingw64 to x86_64-pc-mingw32. It is just a double
> naming of a 64-bit architecture and the API of mingw (and of MS) is
> still the Win32 API with some small extensions for the new windows
> (Vista) version.  Therefore it looks for my self reasonable to unify
> the OS extension for this platforms.

I've committed the following patch:

2006-12-22 Ben Elliston <bje@gnu.org>

        * config.guess (i*:MINGW:*:*): Rename from this ..
        (*:MINGW:*:*): .. to this.

Index: config.guess

<snip>

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]