Re: Put back OTHER_BSS_SECTIONS

["H. J. Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>]

On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 09:16:11AM +0930, Alan Modra wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 10:06:06AM -0700, H. J. Lu wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 07:43:40AM -0700, H. J. Lu wrote:
> > > Hi Alan,
> > > 
> > > Your patch
> > > 
> > > http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2006-10/msg00289.html
> > > 
> > > put back OTHER_BSS_SECTIONS. Can we apply
> > > 
> > > http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2005-08/msg00071.html
> > > 
> > > to restore the rest?
> > > 
> > 
> > This is the patch to restore OTHER_BSS_SECTIONS.
> 
> Are you sure?  The current script has an align and
> OTHER_BSS_END_SYMBOLS before .lbss.  If you have checked that changing
> this will make no difference then the patch is OK.

It shouldn't be a problem. If both LARGE_SECTIONS and
OTHER_BSS_END_SYMBOLS are defined, I believe that OTHER_BSS_END_SYMBOLS
should cover .lbss.


H.J.