This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Add missing *.gmo files

From: Fred Fish <fnf at specifix dot com>
To: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
Cc: binutils at sourceware dot org, fnf at specifix dot com
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 10:31:54 -0400
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add missing *.gmo files
References: <200606110937.48682.fnf@specifix.com> <200606120951.46692.fnf@specifix.com> <20060612135304.GA30719@nevyn.them.org>
Reply-to: fnf at specifix dot com

On Monday 12 June 2006 09:53, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> Huh?  This should _absolutely_ not be true.  Neither of those should
> have any generated gmo files in them.  Are you really sure that neither
> of these has picked up a branch somehow?

OK, got to the bottom of this.  Don't know how my source tree got
unwanted gmo files in it, I never use that particular copy to build
from.  But the ".cvsignore" files cause cvs to ignore them, so I never
noticed this before.  In addition, when I update, I use the cvs option
"-I\!" which should cause nothing to be ignored, but .cvsignore
apparently has a higher precedence.

Now I remember why I used to zero out the contents of any .cvsignore
files in my checked out source trees.

Sigh.  Sorry for the noise...

-Fred

References:
- [PATCH] Add missing *.gmo files
  - From: Fred Fish
- Re: [PATCH] Add missing *.gmo files
  - From: Fred Fish
- Re: [PATCH] Add missing *.gmo files
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]