This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sourceware.org
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: Test suite results for mipsel-unknown-linux-gnu (2.16.93)
- From: Thiemo Seufer <ths at networkno dot de>
- To: Martin Michlmayr <tbm at cyrius dot com>
- Cc: binutils at sourceware dot org
- Date: Fri, 19 May 2006 19:09:07 +0100
- Subject: Re: Test suite results for mipsel-unknown-linux-gnu (2.16.93)
- References: <20060519172443.GA14717@deprecation.cyrius.com>
Martin Michlmayr wrote:
[snip]
> === ld tests ===
>
> Schedule of variations:
> unix
>
> FAIL: vers24a
> FAIL: vers24b
> FAIL: vers24c
> FAIL: visibility (hidden_undef) (non PIC, load offset)
> FAIL: visibility (hidden_weak) (non PIC)
> FAIL: visibility (hidden_weak)
> FAIL: visibility (hidden_weak) (PIC main, non PIC so)
> FAIL: visibility (hidden_weak) (PIC main)
> FAIL: visibility (protected_undef) (non PIC, load offset)
> FAIL: visibility (protected_weak) (non PIC)
> FAIL: visibility (protected_weak)
> FAIL: visibility (protected_weak) (PIC main, non PIC so)
> FAIL: visibility (protected_weak) (PIC main)
> FAIL: MIPS textrel-1
> FAIL: NOCROSSREFS 3
The SIGILL-induced of those are apparently neither hardware nor
endianness dependent, I got the same pattern on two different
machine architectures with different endianness.
Thiemo