This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: PATCH: ld/2338: objdump -d -l doesn't work correctly

From: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at adacore dot com>
To: "H. J. Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>, binutils at sourceware dot org
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2006 18:25:37 +0100
Subject: Re: PATCH: ld/2338: objdump -d -l doesn't work correctly
References: <002901c6322b$84efac00$a501a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM> <200602201521.21918.ebotcazou@adacore.com> <20060220171042.GA28239@lucon.org>

> Are you really sure that it isn't a gcc bug? "objdump -d -l" works
> fine with -ffunction-sections for me. Do you have a testcase?

"objdump -d -l" works fine, but not _bfd_dwarf2_find_nearest_line in the sense 
that it returns nothing for most of the functions (that's the very reason the 
former now works).  And I'm under the impression Alan's suggestion would work 
only if decode_line_info was able to process relocations.

-- 
Eric Botcazou

Follow-Ups:
- Re: PATCH: ld/2338: objdump -d -l doesn't work correctly
  - From: H. J. Lu

References:
- RE: PATCH: ld/2338: objdump -d -l doesn't work correctly
  - From: Dave Korn
- Re: PATCH: ld/2338: objdump -d -l doesn't work correctly
  - From: Eric Botcazou
- Re: PATCH: ld/2338: objdump -d -l doesn't work correctly
  - From: H. J. Lu

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]