This is the mail archive of the binutils@sourceware.org mailing list for the binutils project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: cross toolchain vs. info files


On Sat, 2006-01-07 at 17:31 -0500, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> On Sat, 7 Jan 2006, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> > On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 09:31 -0800, Doug Evans wrote:
> > > Dave Korn writes:
> > >  >   This means that 1) you can't look them up by "info $target-$utilityname" (it
> > >  > brings you the related manpage instead)
> > > ... but if one has 5 targets why replicate the same document 5 times?
> > I have ca. 10 installed ... ;)
> > ... because the versions of the tools aren't necessarily identical and
> > because the man pages also can diverge between version.
> 
> I'll put my vote for the target prefix too, maybe *in addition*
> to the base tool-name.
Well, I vote for a "1:1 match of info pages to a tool's name".

i.e. $target-xxx.info for cross toolchains, and xxx.info for non-cross
toolchains.

>   To counter echristo's argumement, I see
> that people using cross-targets that want to RTFM, less often
> know what version they use than what target they use.
I think, people expect "a package to install free of conflicts".

ATM, this applies to most parts of a GNU cross toolchain, except for
info pages and to i18n support (locale/*).

Ralf




Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]