This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sourceware.org
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: [RFC] Providing init_fini_syms earlier?
- From: Michael Matz <matz at suse dot de>
- To: Alan Modra <amodra at bigpond dot net dot au>
- Cc: "H. J. Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>, binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2005 10:49:21 +0200 (CEST)
- Subject: Re: [RFC] Providing init_fini_syms earlier?
- References: <20050711180655.GN5314@systemhalted.org> <20050711190623.GP4740@sunsite.mff.cuni.cz><20050711212643.GA4707@lucon.org> <20050712005740.GI30960@bubble.grove.modra.org><20050713004712.GA27973@lucon.org> <20050713133211.GN30960@bubble.grove.modra.org><20050713134825.GO30960@bubble.grove.modra.org> <20050714135406.GA28189@bubble.grove.modra.org><Pine.LNX.4.58.0508050749200.15214@wotan.suse.de><Pine.LNX.4.58.0508050947070.15214@wotan.suse.de> <20050805082307.GO2874@bubble.grove.modra.org>
Hi,
On Fri, 5 Aug 2005, Alan Modra wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 05, 2005 at 09:53:09AM +0200, Michael Matz wrote:
> > I must admit that I initially noticed the problem with HJs 2.16.91.0.2
> > binutils, but I now reproduced it with clean CVS binutils.
>
> Even now? We are back to defining these in the linker script.
Guarrr! Why am I debugging this half the night, when you sneak in all
the fixes behind me ;-) [the CVS checkout I used was from a CVS mirror,
which updates only few times a day, and so it was just a few hours too old
:-/ ] My apologies.
The current current (sic!) CVS indeed has no problems on alpha anymore.
HJ: as mentioned your 2.16.91.0.2 were created in the time frame which
contained the problems, so you might consider doing a new release
somewhen.
Ciao,
Michael.