This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: x86-64 large data sections updated

From: Ian Lance Taylor <ian at airs dot com>
To: "H. J. Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
Cc: Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>, binutils at sources dot redhat dot com, rth at redhat dot com
Date: 15 Jun 2005 15:30:23 -0400
Subject: Re: x86-64 large data sections updated
References: <20050614221315.GF19948@kam.mff.cuni.cz><20050615011902.GA7374@lucon.org><20050615115458.GJ8728@kam.mff.cuni.cz><20050615131546.GB17667@lucon.org> <20050615134414.GA18901@lucon.org>

"H. J. Lu" <hjl@lucon.org> writes:

> A symbol in SHN_M32R_SCOMMON winds up in SHN_COMMON. We need to provide
> a way to support processor/OS specific common indices.

This does work for MIPS, with SHN_MIPS_SCOMMON.  It's just that it is
done in a rather ugly way.  If you want to introduce a cleaner way,
that sounds fine to me.

Ian

References:
- x86-64 large data sections updated
  - From: Jan Hubicka
- Re: x86-64 large data sections updated
  - From: H. J. Lu
- Re: x86-64 large data sections updated
  - From: Jan Hubicka
- Re: x86-64 large data sections updated
  - From: H. J. Lu
- Re: x86-64 large data sections updated
  - From: H. J. Lu

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]