This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
xfail ld-undefined test for Xtensa
- From: Bob Wilson <bwilson at tensilica dot com>
- To: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 13:56:39 -0700
- Subject: xfail ld-undefined test for Xtensa
Xtensa targets fail the ld-undefined test because the line number in the error
message is wrong. I think this is due to the use of literal pools for Xtensa.
The test is already marked as an expected failure for s390 for the same reason,
so I've committed this patch to mark it as an expected failure for xtensa-*-*.
2005-05-11 Bob Wilson <bob.wilson@acm.org>
* ld-undefined/undefined.exp: xfail xtensa-*-*.
Index: ld-undefined/undefined.exp
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/ld/testsuite/ld-undefined/undefined.exp,v
retrieving revision 1.22
diff -u -r1.22 undefined.exp
--- ld-undefined/undefined.exp 22 Mar 2005 14:20:38 -0000 1.22
+++ ld-undefined/undefined.exp 11 May 2005 20:49:40 -0000
@@ -128,5 +128,7 @@
# of 9. On 64 bit s/390 this works because of the new brasl instruction that
# doesn't need a literal pool entry.
setup_xfail s390-*-*
+# Xtensa also uses a literal pool and has the same problem as s/390.
+setup_xfail xtensa-*-*
checkund $ml $testline