This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: powerpc new PLT and GOT

Alan Modra <amodra@bigpond.net.au> writes:

> o PLT should be split into two sections, one containing code which we'll
>   call .glink, the other containing just data, which we'll call .plt.
>   .glink will be generated by ld somewhere in the text segment, and
>   contains a special symbol resolver stub, and a number of PLT call code
>   stubs.

Would it make sense to name them .plt and .got.plt instead of .glink and
.plt?  That would make them closer to the traditional use on other
architectures.

Andreas.

-- 
Andreas Schwab, SuSE Labs, schwab@suse.de
SuSE Linux Products GmbH, Maxfeldstraße 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756  01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]