This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
[patch] Missing R_ARM_PLT32 cases
- From: Paul Brook <paul at codesourcery dot com>
- To: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Mon, 2 May 2005 00:31:20 +0100
- Subject: [patch] Missing R_ARM_PLT32 cases
The attached patch fixes a couple of places where we should be treating
R_ARM_PLT32 the same as R_ARM_PC24, but don't. The the first was causing
failures in the g++ testsuite.
Tested on arm-none-gnueabi.
Applied to binutils-csl-arm-2005q1-branch
Ok for mainline?
Paul
2005-05-01 Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
* elf32-arm.c (bfd_elf32_arm_process_before_allocation): Treat
R_ARM_PLT32 the same as R_ARM_PC24.
(arm_add_to_rel): Ditto.
Index: bfd/elf32-arm.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /var/cvsroot/src-cvs/src/bfd/elf32-arm.c,v
retrieving revision 1.22.2.3.2.6
diff -u -p -r1.22.2.3.2.6 elf32-arm.c
--- bfd/elf32-arm.c 26 Apr 2005 05:31:38 -0000 1.22.2.3.2.6
+++ bfd/elf32-arm.c 1 May 2005 22:51:40 -0000
@@ -2393,6 +2393,7 @@ bfd_elf32_arm_process_before_allocation
switch (r_type)
{
case R_ARM_PC24:
+ case R_ARM_PLT32:
#ifndef OLD_ARM_ABI
case R_ARM_CALL:
case R_ARM_JUMP24:
@@ -2413,7 +2414,7 @@ bfd_elf32_arm_process_before_allocation
break;
default:
- break;
+ abort ();
}
}
@@ -3993,6 +3994,7 @@ arm_add_to_rel (bfd * abfd,
break;
case R_ARM_PC24:
+ case R_ARM_PLT32:
#ifndef OLD_ARM_ABI
case R_ARM_CALL:
case R_ARM_JUMP24: