This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: [RFA] obsoleting BFD_NEED_DECLARATION
Daniel Jacobowitz (drow@false.org):
> Jerome, could you please revert the bfd.m4 parts of this patch for now?
> binutils/, ld/, and mmalloc/ all use this. Those directories still use
> autoconf 2.13.
Mmmm, indeed; sorry for that. Thanks for noticing it.
FYI, here is the patch that I checked in:
2005-04-26 Jerome Guitton <guitton@gnat.com>
* bfd.m4 (BFD_NEED_DECLARATION): Restore.
Index: bfd.m4
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/bfd/bfd.m4,v
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.2 bfd.m4
--- bfd.m4 22 Apr 2005 13:58:11 -0000 1.2
+++ bfd.m4 26 Apr 2005 09:18:42 -0000
@@ -1,6 +1,36 @@
dnl This file was derived from acinclude.m4.
+dnl See whether we need a declaration for a function.
+
+AC_DEFUN([BFD_NEED_DECLARATION],
+[AC_MSG_CHECKING([whether $1 must be declared])
+AC_CACHE_VAL(bfd_cv_decl_needed_$1,
+[AC_TRY_COMPILE([
+#include <stdio.h>
+#ifdef HAVE_STRING_H
+#include <string.h>
+#else
+#ifdef HAVE_STRINGS_H
+#include <strings.h>
+#endif
+#endif
+#ifdef HAVE_STDLIB_H
+#include <stdlib.h>
+#endif
+#ifdef HAVE_UNISTD_H
+#include <unistd.h>
+#endif],
+[char *(*pfn) = (char *(*)) $1],
+bfd_cv_decl_needed_$1=no, bfd_cv_decl_needed_$1=yes)])
+AC_MSG_RESULT($bfd_cv_decl_needed_$1)
+if test $bfd_cv_decl_needed_$1 = yes; then
+ AC_DEFINE([NEED_DECLARATION_]translit($1, [a-z], [A-Z]), 1,
+ [Define if $1 is not declared in system header files.])
+fi
+])dnl
+
+
dnl Check for existence of a type $1 in sys/procfs.h
AC_DEFUN([BFD_HAVE_SYS_PROCFS_TYPE],