This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: [RFA] compilation warnings in bfd on Alpha/Tru64

Jerome Guitton <guitton@adacore.com> writes:

> Mark Kettenis (mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl):
> 
> > Hmm.  Shouldn't we start using the standard AC_CHECK_DECL instead of
> > BFD_NEEDED_DECLARATION?
> 
> I am certainly *not* the good person to answer this question ;-)
> It is quite easy to change from one to another, I would say. Why
> BFD_NEEDED_DECLARATION was defined in the first place?

Because BFD_NEEDED_DECLARATION was invented before AC_CHECK_DECL
existed.

Ian
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]