This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: "Error: constant too large" on mips gas

From: Atsushi Nemoto <anemo at mba dot ocn dot ne dot jp>
To: macro at linux-mips dot org
Cc: echristo at redhat dot com, drow at false dot org, binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2005 15:25:04 +0900 (JST)
Subject: Re: "Error: constant too large" on mips gas
References: <1113068818.5494.4.camel@localhost.localdomain><Pine.LNX.4.61L.0504111732130.31547@blysk.ds.pg.gda.pl><20050415.101213.75184527.nemoto@toshiba-tops.co.jp>

>>>>> On Fri, 15 Apr 2005 10:12:13 +0900 (JST), Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> said:
anemo> Thanks, I have no problem with this.

No, I still have a problem ...

$ cat foo.s
	li	$8, 0x80000010
$ mips64-linux-as -64 foo.s
foo.s: Assembler messages:
foo.s:1: Error: Number (0x080000010) larger than 32 bits

Isn't this acceptable?  This code comes from linux-mips kernel.

In arch/mips/kernel/entry.S:
	li	t0, _TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE | _TIF_SYSCALL_AUDIT
Where:
#define TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE	31	/* syscall trace active */
#define _TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG	(1<<TIF_POLLING_NRFLAG)

Should we modify the kernel code?

Thank you.
---
Atsushi Nemoto

Follow-Ups:
- Re: "Error: constant too large" on mips gas
  - From: Atsushi Nemoto

References:
- Re: "Error: constant too large" on mips gas
  - From: Eric Christopher
- Re: "Error: constant too large" on mips gas
  - From: Maciej W. Rozycki
- Re: "Error: constant too large" on mips gas
  - From: Atsushi Nemoto

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]