This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: [PATCH] x86: more Intel syntax work
- From: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich at novell dot com>
- To: <dnovillo at redhat dot com>,<nickc at redhat dot com>
- Cc: <binutils at sources dot redhat dot com>
- Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2005 09:13:08 +0100
- Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: more Intel syntax work
>>> Diego Novillo <dnovillo@redhat.com> 14.03.05 18:12:59 >>>
>On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 05:44:45PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote:
>
>> 2005-03-14 Jan Beulich <jbeulich@novell.com>
>>
>> * config/tc-i386.c (i386_scale): Beautify error message.
>> (Intel syntax comments): Update.
>> (struct intel_parser_s): Add fields in_offset, in_bracket, and
>> next_operand.
>> (intel_e04_1, intel_e05_1, intel_e05_1, intel_e09_1,
>> intel_e10_1):
>> Remove declarations.
>> [ ... ]
>>
>This looks basically OK. Though I haven't touched this code in
>such a long time that I'm not sure I'm the best one qualified to
>review patches in this area.
>
>Perhaps it would be best if I relinquished maintainership of the
>Intel syntax. Nick?
So how should I deal with this? Should I take this as approval? Should
I wait for something else to happen?
Thanks, Jan