This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: RFC:elf32-m68k.c for coldfire v4e

From: Alan Modra <amodra at bigpond dot net dot au>
To: Peter Barada <peter at the-baradas dot com>
Cc: cjaiprakash at hcltech dot com, binutils at sources dot redhat dot com,cjaiprakash at noida dot hcltech dot com
Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 08:01:38 +1030
Subject: Re: RFC:elf32-m68k.c for coldfire v4e
References: <267988DEACEC5A4D86D5FCD780313FBB044A8245@exch-03.noida.hcltech.com> <20050210103632.GK22497@bubble.modra.org> <20050210172539.2C9889842C@baradas.org>

On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 12:25:39PM -0500, Peter Barada wrote:
> 
> >> Though these changes should be valid for m68k as well but the size of PLT is
> >> increased a bit. What I want to know is will this be acceptable?
> >
> >No.  ld.so modifies the PLT, so the layout cannot change.
> 
> Then the CPU32 PLT code shouldn't work since its the CPU32 PLT entries
> are larger than the m68k ones....

Duh.  I'm just not thinking straight.

-- 
Alan Modra
IBM OzLabs - Linux Technology Centre

References:
- RFC:elf32-m68k.c for coldfire v4e
  - From: C Jaiprakash, Noida
- Re: RFC:elf32-m68k.c for coldfire v4e
  - From: Alan Modra
- Re: RFC:elf32-m68k.c for coldfire v4e
  - From: Peter Barada

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]