This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: C++filt grief.

From: Alan Modra <amodra at bigpond dot net dot au>
To: Dave Korn <dk at artimi dot com>
Cc: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 11:03:24 +0930
Subject: Re: C++filt grief.
References: <NUTMEGt3HvoFOAmEaJs0000001a@NUTMEG.CAM.ARTIMI.COM> <NUTMEGgC81TbdkSmLAz00000024@NUTMEG.CAM.ARTIMI.COM>

On Mon, Oct 18, 2004 at 04:05:59PM +0100, Dave Korn wrote:
>   Although come to think of it, shouldn't c++filt be a bit smarter about
> this situation?  If you compile something with gcc and dump the symbols with
> nm, shouldn't what you get be suitable for feeding into c++filt without
> further processing?

It is, if you use the right target c++filt.

-- 
Alan Modra
IBM OzLabs - Linux Technology Centre

Follow-Ups:
- Cygwin binutils packaging error? [was RE: C++filt grief.]
  - From: Dave Korn

References:
- C++filt grief.
  - From: Dave Korn
- RE: C++filt grief.
  - From: Dave Korn

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]