This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: gcc and -fPIC

From: Alan Modra <amodra at bigpond dot net dot au>
To: Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at bitrange dot com>
Cc: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2004 22:04:57 +0930
Subject: Re: gcc and -fPIC
References: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0410151858410.24883@bbs.intern> <jey8i792qi.fsf@sykes.suse.de> <Pine.LNX.4.61.0410160757170.10357@bbs.intern> <je1xfyc1aj.fsf@sykes.suse.de> <20041016151728.GA5278@nevyn.them.org> <Pine.LNX.4.61.0410172051060.13547@bbs.intern> <20041017193020.GA24512@nevyn.them.org> <Pine.LNX.4.61.0410180707550.675@bbs.intern> <20041018070933.GB23491@bubble.modra.org> <Pine.BSF.4.58.0410180426140.33647@dair.pair.com>

On Mon, Oct 18, 2004 at 04:29:09AM -0400, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> Would it be ok to handle ":" this way as well?
> (It's used for CRIS, because '@' is a line-terminator.)

Yes, I think it would be reasonable.

-- 
Alan Modra
IBM OzLabs - Linux Technology Centre

References:
- gcc and -fPIC
  - From: Gerhard Wiesinger
- Re: gcc and -fPIC
  - From: Andreas Schwab
- Re: gcc and -fPIC
  - From: Gerhard Wiesinger
- Re: gcc and -fPIC
  - From: Andreas Schwab
- Re: gcc and -fPIC
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: gcc and -fPIC
  - From: Gerhard Wiesinger
- Re: gcc and -fPIC
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: gcc and -fPIC
  - From: Gerhard Wiesinger
- Re: gcc and -fPIC
  - From: Alan Modra
- Re: gcc and -fPIC
  - From: Hans-Peter Nilsson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]