This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: [arm] Rephrase error message.
- From: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- To: Paul Brook <paul at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 09:26:22 +0100
- Subject: Re: [arm] Rephrase error message.
- Organization: GNU
- References: <200410120052.27833.paul@codesourcery.com>
On Tue, 2004-10-12 at 00:52, Paul Brook wrote:
> One of the linker error messages in elf32-arm.h talks about the output file
> being "compiled" for a particular eabi version. Patch below rephrases this
> slightly to (hopefully) avoid confusion between input files and output files.
>
> Ok?
>
> 2004-10-12 Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
>
> * elf32-arm.h (elf32_arm_merge_private_bfd_data): Rephrase error
> message.
>
> Index: elf32-arm.h
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/src/src/bfd/elf32-arm.h,v
> retrieving revision 1.149
> diff -u -p -r1.149 elf32-arm.h
> --- elf32-arm.h 8 Oct 2004 14:53:59 -0000 1.149
> +++ elf32-arm.h 11 Oct 2004 23:33:41 -0000
> @@ -2504,7 +2504,7 @@ elf32_arm_merge_private_bfd_data (bfd *
> if (EF_ARM_EABI_VERSION (in_flags) != EF_ARM_EABI_VERSION (out_flags))
> {
> _bfd_error_handler
> - (_("ERROR: %B is compiled for EABI version %d, whereas %B is compiled for
> version %d"),
> + (_("ERROR: %B is compiled for EABI version %d, whereas target %B is version
> %d"),
> ibfd, obfd,
> (in_flags & EF_ARM_EABIMASK) >> 24,
> (out_flags & EF_ARM_EABIMASK) >> 24);
Approved in principle, but how about "ERROR: Source object %B has EABI
version %d, but target %B has EABI version %d"?
R.