This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

i386 intel syntax integer load/store fp instructions


Is there anybody able to provide the origin for fildd, fistpd, and
fisttpd? It would seem to me that if thus suffixed instructions exist at
all in Intel syntax (after all, Intel syntax in general is not known to
use suffixes), then these would perhaps rather mean 32-bit loads/stores
(currently, gas translates them to 64-bit ones, identical to the
respective q-suffixed ones).

Thanks for any clarification, Jan


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]