This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Tue, May 25, 2004 at 06:09:38PM -0700, H. J. Lu wrote: > On Sat, May 22, 2004 at 11:27:22AM +0930, Alan Modra wrote: > > > > I doubt this patch is complete. If you need to special case certain > > accesses in relax_section, how is it that relocate_section escapes a > > need for the same special case code? This might prove more difficult, > > as you might need to pull apart _bfd_elf_rela_local_sym. I'm also still > > concerned that other ia64 code sequences might use R_IA64_LTOFF22X in a > > way that requires you include the addend. Please discuss this with Jim, > > I'm not familiar enough with ia64 to know. > > > > elfNN_ia64_relax_section shouldn't calls _bfd_merged_section_offset just > because tsec->sec_info_type == ELF_INFO_TYPE_MERGE. For local symbols, > it should also check > > (tsec->flags & SEC_MERGE) && ELF_ST_TYPE (isym->st_info) == STT_SECTION > > Here is the updated one. H.J.
Attachment:
bfd-ia64-merge-4.patch
Description: Text document
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |