This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Correct the type of _PROCEDURE_LINKAGE_TABLE_


On Fri, May 28, 2004 at 02:41:27PM +0930, Alan Modra wrote:
> On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 11:51:45AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > On Thu, May 27, 2004 at 09:36:49AM +0930, Alan Modra wrote:
> > > On Wed, May 26, 2004 at 05:31:24PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > > > objdump will not dump the PLT as instructions if it starts
> > > > with an STT_OBJECT symbol.
> > > 
> > > Really?  Fix objdump then.  _PROCEDURE_LINKAGE_TABLE_ isn't a function,
> > > nor are many other symbols in code sections.
> > 
> > >From the gABI:
> > 
> > STT_OBJECT
> >                   The symbol is associated with a data object, such as a variable,
> >                   an array, and so on.
> > 
> > STT_FUNC
> >                   The symbol is associated with a function or other executable
> >                   code.
> > 
> > _PROCEDURE_LINKAGE_TABLE_ in this case is "other executable code", and not a "data
> > object", so I think it should be STT_FUNC.
> 
> Isn't a table an array of sorts?  Perhaps it won't hurt anything to
> change the type, but who knows?  If you can twist Ian's arm to approve
> it, then fine!  Otherwise, I'm inclined to be grumpy and reject the
> patch.

A mighty messed up array, if you ask me.  OK.  Ian, any comment?

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]