This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Results for binutils 2.15.90 20040309 testsuite on i786-pc-cygwin
- From: Christian Joensson <christian at j-son dot org>
- To: binutils <binutils at sources dot redhat dot com>
- Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2004 10:05:52 +0100
- Subject: Results for binutils 2.15.90 20040309 testsuite on i786-pc-cygwin
Windows XP/Pro SP1 cygwin P4 system with these packages:
binutils 20030901-1 2.14.90 20030901
bison 20030307-1 1.875b
cygwin 1.5.7-1
dejagnu 20021217-2 1.4.2.x
gawk 3.1.3-4
gcc 3.3.1-3
w32api 2.5-1
LAST_UPDATED: Tue Mar 9 08:20:37 UTC 2004
Native configuration is i786-pc-cygwin
=== binutils tests ===
Running target unix
=== binutils Summary ===
# of expected passes 68
# of expected failures 1
=== gas tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: i386 pcrel reloc
=== gas Summary ===
# of expected passes 45
# of unexpected failures 1
=== ld tests ===
Running target unix
FAIL: bootstrap
FAIL: bootstrap with strip
FAIL: bootstrap with --static
FAIL: bootstrap with --traditional-format
FAIL: bootstrap with --no-keep-memory
FAIL: bootstrap with --relax
FAIL: cdtest with -Ur
FAIL: NOCROSSREFS 2
FAIL: ld-scripts/provide-1
FAIL: ld-scripts/provide-2
FAIL: ld-scripts/size-1
=== ld Summary ===
# of expected passes 23
# of unexpected failures 11
# of expected failures 3
version: binutils 2.15.90 20040309
Platform: i786-pc-cygwin
configure flags: pentium4-cygwin --prefix=/usr/local/gcc-binutils --enable-shared --enable-threads=posix --with-system-zlib
Counting all warnings,
there are 31 warnings in stage0 of this bootstrap.
Number of warnings per file:
11 /usr/local/src/trunk/src/binutils/defparse.y
3 libiberty/regex.c
3 lex.yy.c
3 include/getopt.h
2 libiberty/getopt.c
2 include/fibheap.h
2 /usr/local/src/trunk/src/bfd/elf.c
1 libtool
1 libiberty/strsignal.c
1 include/xregex2.h
1 /usr/local/src/trunk/src/intl/l10nflist.c
1 /usr/local/src/trunk/src/binutils/dllwrap.c
Number of warning types:
11 stray \`???' treated as white space
4 signed and unsigned type in conditional expression
3 function declaration isn't a prototype
3 \`???' defined but not used
2 unused parameter \`???'
2 bit-field \`???' type invalid in ISO C
2 ??? format, ??? arg (arg ???)
1 comparison between signed and unsigned
1 assignment makes pointer from integer without a cast
1 \`???' seems to be moved
1 ISO C90 does not support \`static' or type qualifiers in parameter array declarators