This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: Binutils 2.15
- From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at mvista dot com>
- To: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Wed, 18 Feb 2004 22:37:52 -0500
- Subject: Re: Binutils 2.15
- References: <20040129183201.GA16370@nevyn.them.org> <1075415114.3351.0.camel@dzur.sfbay.redhat.com> <87fzdyl5x6.fsf@wasabisystems.com> <20040129225908.GA22578@nevyn.them.org> <4CE1B0CF-52C8-11D8-9562-000A95DA505C@dberlin.org> <20040206162012.GA15720@nevyn.them.org> <m3znbwklp8.fsf@gossamer.airs.com>
On Fri, Feb 06, 2004 at 03:16:35PM -0500, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com> writes:
>
> > I have taken care of this. All that remains is to link it from the web
> > site, starting with something minimal like:
> >
> > +<H3>Bug reports</H3>
> > +
> > +There is a bug-tracking system at
> > + <a href="http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/">http://sources.redhat.com/bugzilla/</a>.
> > +
>
> Cool, there are even bugs in there. Not binutils bugs, perhaps, but
> still bugs.
>
> I think you should go ahead and put this on the binutils web page.
>
> > Do we want bugzilla chatter to go to bug-binutils@gnu.org? I think it
> > would be appropriate.
>
> Well, we don't glibc bugzilla stuff to go to bug-binutils. That
> should go to bug-glibc, I think. I know nothing about bugzilla. If
> you can restrict it to stuff about binutils, then bug-binutils is
> fine. If it doesn't work out for some reason, we'll create a new
> list.
>
> Does anybody object to this?
Since no one objected, I've asked Daniel to do this. Let's see how it
works out. I also added it to the web page.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer