This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: mips address+symbol issue.
On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 02:28:41PM -0800, Michel Lespinasse wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 23, 2004 at 11:10:51PM +0100, Erik Trulsson wrote:
> > There are many ways to interpret one could interpret it, but the
> > interpretation that I believe is the correct is the following:
> > Remember that a[i] is just syntactic sugar for *(a+i).
> Should it not be syntactic sugar for *(a+(i)) instead ?
(*((a)+(i))) actually, but otherwise you are right.
<Insert your favourite quote here.>