This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: [BUG] Regression in 2.14.90 (relative to 2.13.90)
- From: Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com>
- To: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2003 07:39:58 +0000
- Subject: Re: [BUG] Regression in 2.14.90 (relative to 2.13.90)
- References: <m3k75ozdlx.fsf@redhat.com> <20031125172909.GA5919@lucon.org><20031125220248.GA967@alinoe.com> <20031126010816.GA13067@lucon.org><20031126021325.GA12151@alinoe.com><20031126043049.GA4512@nevyn.them.org> <m37k1njmx4.fsf@redhat.com><20031126153606.GA10847@nevyn.them.org> <m3oeuzhyu1.fsf@redhat.com><20031126194452.GA18482@alinoe.com> <20031219180404.GA3867@alinoe.com>
Hi Carlo,
>> > info as possible ? It seems that including this information is what
>> > it causing the problem, and ideally what we ought to be doing is
>> > discarding .gnu.linkonce sections containing debug info, rather than
>> > retaining them.
>>
>> I'd be happy when the info is disregarded. Much better than
>> assigning it the address of another function.
>>
>> Is it possible to do this instead, before 2.14 is released
>> at large?
>
> What is the status of this Problem Report?
Sorry - it has been sidelined whilst I try to get through all of the
work that boss has assigned to me. I think that the last thing that
happened was that HJ said that there was a better way to fix the
problem, but I am not sure if he implemented it.
Cheers
Nick