This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] R_390_RELATIVE bug fix for s390*.

From: Alan Modra <amodra at bigpond dot net dot au>
To: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky at de dot ibm dot com>
Cc: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 22:42:28 +1030
Subject: Re: [PATCH] R_390_RELATIVE bug fix for s390*.
References: <OF3601D0F3.8041BB41-ONC1256DE1.003752D3-C1256DE1.00416CC1@de.ibm.com>

On Mon, Nov 17, 2003 at 12:54:36PM +0100, Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
> Oh well, it seemed to be a nice idea to rewrite the relocations against
> local symbols to relocations against to section start. I'll change the
> code to emit the original relocation in this case.

No, it is quite OK to use relocations against section symbols.  What I
was trying to point out is that you should subtract the symbol value
from the reloc addend.

-- 
Alan Modra
IBM OzLabs - Linux Technology Centre

References:
- Re: [PATCH] R_390_RELATIVE bug fix for s390*.
  - From: Martin Schwidefsky

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]