This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Why bfd_section_<op> (*BFD*, sec, ...?)

Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com> writes:


Why do the section operators take a BFD when the SEC already has a BFD
back-pointer?  Vis: bfd_get_section_name et.al.


Historical.

Ah. Can it go? GDB appears to drag "bfd" around based on the equally historic assumption that these need it :-)

Andrew


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]