This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [discussion/patch] use mkstemps/mkdtemps instead of mktemp.

From: Alan Modra <amodra at bigpond dot net dot au>
To: Muthukumar Ratty <muthu at iqmail dot net>
Cc: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Sat, 05 Jul 2003 00:34:53 +0930
Subject: Re: [discussion/patch] use mkstemps/mkdtemps instead of mktemp.
References: <Pine.LNX.4.33.0307031536590.14579-100000@Muruga.localdomain><Pine.LNX.4.33.0307032124360.19069-100000@Muruga.localdomain>

On Thu, Jul 03, 2003 at 11:08:05PM -0700, Muthukumar Ratty wrote:
> 
> >From the silence I guess the patch is braindead... oh well.... :(

No, just that everyone is busy.  If you'd like to pursue using
bfd_fdopenr, you might try setting bfd->direction = write_direction
after the bfd_fdopenr and see if that works.

Note that it's generally not necessary to cc anyone responding with
a review of your patch, particularly if they set Mail-followup-to
headers excluding themselves..

-- 
Alan Modra
IBM OzLabs - Linux Technology Centre

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [discussion/patch] use mkstemps/mkdtemps instead of mktemp.
  - From: Muthukumar Ratty

References:
- Re: [discussion/patch] use mkstemps/mkdtemps instead of mktemp.
  - From: Muthukumar Ratty
- Re: [discussion/patch] use mkstemps/mkdtemps instead of mktemp.
  - From: Muthukumar Ratty

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]