This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: RFC: Moving gcc/intl to toplevel; syncing both copies to 0.12.1
- From: "Zack Weinberg" <zack at codesourcery dot com>
- To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at redhat dot com>
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, binutils at sourceware dot org, gdb at sourceware dot org
- Date: Wed, 02 Jul 2003 10:55:29 -0700
- Subject: Re: RFC: Moving gcc/intl to toplevel; syncing both copies to 0.12.1
- References: <877k70yi2t.fsf@codesourcery.com> <3F031B15.8070803@redhat.com>
Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com> writes:
>> I'd like to do this today, and commit to both gcc and src CVS
>> as soon as I've tested it; it is blocking another major change
>> over in gcc land, which needs to happen this week. Will this be
>> okay? Does anyone know a reason why upgrading to 0.12.1 is a bad idea?
>
> Can you two stage this - import into GCC, and then a week or so later,
> import in to SRC? That way the group with the most to gain (and
> apparently the greatest urgency) experience the most pain :-)
I could do that; it will mean that for one week people who construct
combined trees have to be careful with the intl directory, but that
should be ok, yes?
zw