This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: Updated config.guess and config.sub
Hi Svein,
> The other patch was for the lower-level config. I have not yet made
> any specific patches for the binutils-2_14-branch. However, the same
> patch, only for HEAD, can be found here:
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2003-06/msg00557.html (it has
> not been approved yet either). -- So all you really need to do here is
> to approve them for HEAD and for the 2.14 branch, and then I can
> commit them myself.
I have approved and applied the gas part of this patch to both the
mainline and the branch:
> gas/ChangeLog:
> 2003-06-15 Svein E. Seldal <Svein.Seldal@solidas.com>
>
>
> * configure.in: Added c4x as an architecture variant to tic4x.
> * configure: Regenerate.
I am not sure however about the bfd part:
> Index: bfd/config.bfd
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/src/src/bfd/config.bfd,v
> retrieving revision 1.138
> diff -c -3 -p -r1.138 config.bfd
> *** bfd/config.bfd 13 Jun 2003 13:17:58 -0000 1.138
> --- bfd/config.bfd 15 Jun 2003 13:05:34 -0000
> *************** case "${targ}" in
> *** 284,290 ****
> targ_defvec=tic30_coff_vec
> ;;
>
> ! c4x-*-*coff* | tic4x-*-*coff*)
> targ_defvec=tic4x_coff1_vec
> targ_selvecs="tic4x_coff1_beh_vec tic4x_coff2_vec tic4x_coff2_beh_vec tic4x_coff0_vec tic4x_coff0_beh_vec"
> targ_underscore=yes
> --- 284,290 ----
> targ_defvec=tic30_coff_vec
> ;;
>
> ! c4x-*-coff | tic4x-*-coff)
> targ_defvec=tic4x_coff1_vec
> targ_selvecs="tic4x_coff1_beh_vec tic4x_coff2_vec tic4x_coff2_beh_vec tic4x_coff0_vec tic4x_coff0_beh_vec"
> targ_underscore=yes
Why is this change necessary ? Why are you making the tic4x/c4x
target less generic ?
Cheers
Nick