This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: What binutils version is compatible with gcc 3.3 ?

From: Eric Christopher <echristo at redhat dot com>
To: "Mark D. Baushke" <mdb at gnu dot org>
Cc: binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: 20 May 2003 10:31:45 -0700
Subject: Re: What binutils version is compatible with gcc 3.3 ?
Organization:
References: <69081.1053439415@juniper.net> <20030520140740.GA10257@nevyn.them.org> <96007.1053443817@juniper.net>

> (The odd thing to me is that the binutils-2_14-branch seems to mostly
> work, but the top-of-tree trunk does not.)
> 

Top of trunk doesn't because of configure changes.


> 
> Yeah, it looks like the trunk version of newlib includes a fix of ending
> the asm lines with
> 
> 	\n\
> 
> to make the multi-line character string work.

Correct :)

Long time no see Mark.

-eric

-- 
Eric Christopher <echristo@redhat.com>

References:
- What binutils version is compatible with gcc 3.3 ?
  - From: Mark D. Baushke
- Re: What binutils version is compatible with gcc 3.3 ?
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: What binutils version is compatible with gcc 3.3 ?
  - From: Mark D. Baushke

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]