This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |
Other format: | [Raw text] |
On Mon, May 19, 2003 at 05:38:02PM -0700, H. J. Lu wrote: > On Tue, May 20, 2003 at 12:19:19AM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > On Wed, Apr 09, 2003 at 09:22:52AM -0700, H. J. Lu wrote: > > > 2003-04-01 H.J. Lu <hjl@gnu.org> > > > > > > (elf_link_output_extsym): Warn if a forced local symbol is > > > referenced from dynamic objects. Make non-weak undefined symbol > > > with non-default visibility a fatal error. > > > > This change broke static linking with hidden common symbols > > (testcase included in the patch below). > > I don't think it works with dynamic linking either. I found another > bug. I will post a testcase and a patch later. > > > Any reason why you use h->root.type != bfd_link_hash_undefweak > > which can well be a normal bfd_link_hash_defined symbol? > > I have an old patch to fix a related problem: > > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2003-03/msg00080.html > > in a different way. Then I changed it and forgot to update another > patch. That is what happened when you had so many patches on top > of each other. > Here is the new patch. H.J.
Attachment:
binutils-vsb-3.patch
Description: Text document
Index Nav: | [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index] | |
---|---|---|
Message Nav: | [Date Prev] [Date Next] | [Thread Prev] [Thread Next] |