This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: [Fwd: Re: Patch to replace occurrence of Hitachi to Renesas in Binutils]
- From: Nick Clifton <nickc at redhat dot com>
- To: joern dot rennecke at superh dot com
- Cc: RohitS at kpit dot com, binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: 17 Apr 2003 14:54:56 +0100
- Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: Patch to replace occurrence of Hitachi to Renesas in Binutils]
- References: <3E9D691B.376DF859@superh.com>
Hi Joern,
> > Thank you for submitting this patch. It was not quite extensive
> > enough - it did not catch all occurrences of Hitachi in the
> > documentation and sources, but I have fixed these problems.
>
> Could you point out where these were? Note that not all of Hitachi
> has been merged into Renesas, but only their semiconductor business.
> I.e. Circuit boards are still made by Hitachi.
Well the ChangeLogs should point them out, but basically Rohit only
patched the documentation files (*.texi) and omitted to change the
sources. So, for example I changed the names in bfd/archures.c and
bfd/reloc.c. Also include/elf/common.h, gas/config/tc-sh.c etc etc.
I did not make any changes in libgloss or the ld/scriptempl
directories, so there should not be any circuit board related name
changes.
> So when you are talking about the SH family as the architectures
> from SH1 to SH4 or up to SH5, these are now partly being developed
> by Renesas, and partly by SuperH. The SH5 is being developed by
> SuperH.
Ok - I see. If you think that the current documentation and/or sources
are confusing, please feel free to submit a patch.
Cheers
Nick