This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [PATCH] Fix s390 as

From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>
To: Hans-Peter Nilsson <hp at bitrange dot com>, Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky at de dot ibm dot com>, binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 01:45:53 +0100
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix s390 as
References: <OFEADB4B81.205E928C-ONC1256CB6.0034DC10@de.ibm.com> <20030122132133.D17910@sunsite.ms.mff.cuni.cz> <20030122130936.GX949@bubble.sa.bigpond.net.au> <20030122234151.GY949@bubble.sa.bigpond.net.au>
Reply-to: Jakub Jelinek <jakub at redhat dot com>

On Thu, Jan 23, 2003 at 10:11:52AM +1030, Alan Modra wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 22, 2003 at 11:39:36PM +1030, Alan Modra wrote:
> > #define TC_FORCE_RELOCATION_SUB_SAME(FIX, SEG)	\
> >   (! SEG_NORMAL (SEG) || TC_FORCE_RELOCATION (FIX))
> 
> Breaks gas/testsuite/gas/cris/binop-segref.s

The question is if the test is ok and especially if it is
derived from any real-world usage.
If yes, then maybe cris should haev a special TC_FORCE_RELOCATION_SUB_SAME
definition (and comment why it needs such behaviour), otherwise the testcase
just should be fixed.

	Jakub

References:
- Re: [PATCH] Fix s390 as
  - From: Martin Schwidefsky
- Re: [PATCH] Fix s390 as
  - From: Jakub Jelinek
- Re: [PATCH] Fix s390 as
  - From: Alan Modra
- Re: [PATCH] Fix s390 as
  - From: Alan Modra

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]