This is the mail archive of the binutils@sources.redhat.com mailing list for the binutils project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: mips-elf/rtems and binutils 2.13.1pre1


Am Don, 2002-11-07 um 21.26 schrieb Eric Christopher:
> 
> > See the difference between the usd and the sd?  Try changing %1 to %z1
> > in the sd and running your test again.
Thanks. Indeed, your proposal seems to work, at least the affected code
compiles now.

> > I swear I've fixed this problem at least four times now.  Eric,
> > shouldn't all store patters be using %z1?  I guess the last time this
> > was fixed we only got the 32-bit stores.
> > 
> 
> Heck, I think I've fixed it a couple of times. :)
> 
> And yes, I also believe it should be using %z1.

For completeness, below is the patch I used for testing.

Any chances for seeing this bug fixed in gcc-3.2.1? AFAIS, it still is
in the gcc-3_2-branch.

Ralf

Attachment: gcc-3.2-mips.diff
Description: Text document


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]