This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: QNX binutils targets
On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 02:17:05PM -0400, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Oct 2002, H. J. Lu wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 25, 2002 at 01:13:07PM -0400, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> > > Consider instead creating a special-named section, as proposed
> > > in <URL:http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2002-10/msg00454.html>.
> >
> > You have no ideas what you are talking about.
>
> Yes I do. (Is this one of those flame wars? :-)
>
> Please avoid sounding condescending, at least on the subject of
> a debated issue.
>
> I'm considering compatibility with existing tools and objects
> too, which I think you're not with the ELFOSABI change. Having
Backward compatibility is possible with the ELFOSABI change.
> > Please see
> > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2002-10/msg00436.html
>
> I did (see below); it indicates that a EI_OSABI/ELFOSABI change
> is wrong.
>
It is wrong because the ABI is the same. In the case of QNX, the ABI
is different. Did you get it?
H.J.